MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413095400 · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13081842

Pathophysiology of Prediabetes Hyperinsulinemia and Insulin Resistance in the Cardiovascular System

2025· review· en· W4413095400 on OpenAlexafffund
Ghassan Bkaily, Ashley Jazzar, Amira Abou-Aichi, Danielle Jacques

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedicines · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHyperinsulinemiaInsulin resistanceInternal medicineEndocrinologyPrediabetesInsulinType 2 diabetesMedicineDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperinsulinemia refers to an elevated level of circulating insulin (80 and 100 µU/mL), often leading to metabolic disorders such as obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes (T2D). There is no precise and universally accepted definition of hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. The literature in the field remains unclear regarding whether insulin resistance precedes the development of hyperinsulinemia. Recently, a new hypothesis has been proposed suggesting that chronic hyperinsulinemia precedes and causes insulin resistance. The causes of the initiation of hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes are multifactorial. Thus, it is not easy to define in general. Recent work demonstrates that the main prediabetic factor leading to insulin resistance is chronic hyperinsulinemia. However, recent work in the literature proposes that relatively long-term hyperinsulinemia does precede insulin resistance and already promotes cardiovascular remodeling. This later may lead to the development of vascular diseases such as hypertension. Thus, defining hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, as well as their signaling pathways implicated in the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D), needs to be clarified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedicinesSame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207