Integrated Spray Coating for Rapid Production of Thin-Film Composite Membranes with Improved Desalination Efficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the current literature on synthesis of TFC membranes, this research presents a new and state-of-art technique to achieve spray coating of TFC membrane through one-step process. This three-stage formation process is more efficient than other conventional multi-step methods for forming the selective layer and the porous support because this new technique combines spray-assisted phase inversion and interfacial polymerization into a single process. This considerably minimises fabrication time, following a membrane fabrication process of less than 2 hours as opposed to conventional fabrication of between 2 to 5 days. The following TFC as proposed present high-performance enhancement achieved by obtaining a water permeance of 2.6Lm-2h-1bar compared to traditional membranes while maintaining high salt rejection rate of over 95% when tested with 2000ppm saline solution at moderate pressure and ambient temperatures. Furthermore, this process is sustainable oriented, that reduce using unnecessary material and considering the ecology severely. This revolutionary fabrication technique provides an economical, fast and sustainable process for fabricating highly effective TFC membranes that can lead to potential improvement in desalination technology and finding solution to major water issues in the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".