MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413097765 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.07.042

Mean Field Games on Large Sparse Network Limits: Laplexion Dynamics on Graphexons

2025· article· en· W4413097765 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter E. Caines, Minyi Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityMcGill University
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsField (mathematics)Dynamics (music)Computer scienceStatistical physicsMathematicsPhysicsAcousticsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider dynamic games with large subpopulations distributed over large sparse graphs. Each agent on one hand has mean field coupling with all agents located within the same cluster and on the other hand receives impact from neighboring clusters via a graph Laplacian. We aim to derive tractable limit models when the sparse network size tends to infinity, which leads to higher order mean field interaction dynamics. This is justified by asymptotic analysis of the graph Laplacian operator within the large graph limits. Subsequently, the solution equation system of the Laplexion mean field game is obtained within the setting of infinite population and infinite network size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsFrench-language works237,207