Next-generation AI framework for comprehensive oral leukoplakia evaluation and management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oral potentially malignant disorder poses a significant risk of malignant transformation, particularly in cases with epithelial dysplasia (OED). Current OED assessment methods are invasive and lack reliable decision-support tools for cancer risk evaluation and follow-up optimization. This study developed and validated OMMT-PredNet, a fully automated multimodal deep learning framework requiring no manual ROI annotation, for non-invasive OED identification and time-dependent cancer risk prediction. Utilizing data from 649 histopathologically confirmed leukoplakia cases across multiple institutions (2003-2024), including 598 cases in the primary cohort and 51 in the external validation set, the model integrated paired high-resolution clinical images and medical records. OMMT-PredNet achieved an AUC of 0.9592 (95% CI: 0.9491-0.9693) for cancer risk prediction and 0.9219 (95% CI: 0.9088-0.9349) for OED identification, with high specificity (MT: 0.9490; OED: 0.9182) and precision (MT: 0.9442; OED: 0.9303). Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed clinical applicability, while external validation demonstrated robustness. This multidimensional model effectively predicts OED and cancer risk, highlighting its global applicability in enhancing oral cancer screening and improving patient outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".