MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413103484 · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103394

Locating and profiling city street trees using Baidu street view images for carbon storage evaluation

2025· article· en· W4413103484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsProfiling (computer programming)Computer scienceGeographyData scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Traditional methods for estimating the carbon storage of street trees involve manual sampling, which incurs substantial human, material, and temporal costs in establishing a city-wide comprehensive inventory of street trees. In this study, we propose a multi-task convolutional neural network called STV-MNet to identify individual- level and city-wide street trees from Baidu street view images (BSVIs). We measured the structural and locational information of the identified trees using cylindrical projection and MonoDepth depth estimation network. STV-MNet achieved a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 0.733 and a mean average precision of 0.881 at IoU 50 % (mAP50) in individual tree identification, outperforming DeepLab v3+ (mIoU of 0.641) and YOLO v3 (mAP50 of 0.767). Validation with street-measured data demonstrates that our method produces more precise estimations for both tree height and breast diameter, with the root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.09 m and the normalized RMSE of 0.005 m for tree height and the RMSE of 0.01 m and the normalized RMSE of 0.016 m for diameter at breast height (DBH). The location prediction of street trees achieves a minimum error of 0.67 m and an average error of 7.37 m. Using the biomass carbon storage equation, we calculated the carbon storage of individual street trees in Changsha City, Hunan Province, China. The results indicate that the total carbon storage of 333,717 street trees in urban areas of Changsha City is 1.64 × 10 5 tons, and the annual carbon sequestration capacity across the urban areas is 8014.57 tons. In certain areas, street tree resources have enabled the achievement of carbon neutrality in road transportation. This study presents a novel approach to managing urban street tree carbon storage, leveraging STV-MNet for automatic carbon storage estimates, and demonstrates high practical significance in low-cost and city-wide street tree carbon storage estimation. • STV-MNet is proposed for individual-level street tree identification from Baidu street view images. • The structural and location information of street trees were predicted in the urban areas of Changsha City. • The calculated total carbon storage of urban street trees in Changsha City is 1.64 × 10 5 tons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it