MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413103886 · doi:10.5206/mase/19307

Analysis of a multi-item queueing inventory system operating with an exchange facility

2025· article· en· W4413103886 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. Rasmi, M. J. Jacob

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics in Applied Sciences and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueueing theoryComputer scienceOperating systemComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores a stochastic queuing-inventory system designed to efficiently manage both new and returned items, offering practical solutions for diverse customer needs. The system differentiates services for various customer classes through dedicated channels, encompassing the sale of new and returned items, as well as the purchase of used items from customers. This model incorporates four parallel queues for distinct customer classes, each serviced by a dedicated server. Customer arrivals are modeled using a Markovian Arrival Process (MMAP), with service times being exponentially distributed and independent. An $(s, S)$ policy is implemented for replenishing fresh items. The primary objective is to enhance service accessibility for various customer types within a single facility, promoting operational efficiency and customer satisfaction. Additionally, the system's ability to purchase used items underscores its role in fostering sustainability in an evolving society. By applying the Neuts matrix geometric technique, the paper analyzes the system to derive the long-term probability distribution and significant performance metrics. Numerical methods are utilized to investigate key system parameters and performance measures, and a cost function is introduced and optimized concerning the reorder level. This comprehensive analysis offers valuable insights for optimizing inventory and queuing systems in practical, real-world applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics in Applied Sciences and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationFrench-language works237,207