MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413104994 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djaf214

Childhood cancer data initiative: expanded access to tumor molecular profiling for children, adolescents, and young adults

2025· article· en· W4413104994 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Flores‐Toro, Subhashini Jagu, Malcolm A. Smith, John Shern, Douglas S. Hawkins, Elaine R. Mardis, Todd A. Alonzo, Thalia Beeles, Nilsa C. Ramirez, Diana Thomas, Catherine E. Cottrell, Kareesma Parbhoo, Katherine A. Janeway, Sarah Leary, Sapna Oberoi, Rajkumar Venkatramani, Meredith S. Irwin, Theodore W. Laetsch, Kenneth Chen, Kelly M. Bailey, Mary Beth Sullivan, Emily S. Boja, Douglas R. Lowy, Jaime M. Guidry Auvil, Brigitte C Wideman, Warren A. Kibbe, James H. Doroshow

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsChildhood cancerProfiling (computer programming)MedicineCogCancerOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Molecular Characterization Initiative (MCI), a key effort of the National Cancer Institute's Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI), was launched in 2022 in collaboration with the Children's Oncology Group (COG) to bring comprehensive genomic and molecular profiling to children, adolescents, and young adults diagnosed with cancer. The MCI provides paired tumor and germline molecular testing, with results returned to clinicians to inform care. Deidentified data are made available to the research community through the CCDI Data Ecosystem to facilitate the discovery of new treatment strategies. This commentary outlines the MCI's development, key accomplishments to date, and its role in laying the foundation for standardized clinical diagnostics in pediatric oncology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.082
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.082
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207