NCTQ-01 RISK OF RADIATION NECROSIS FOLLOWING CONCURRENT VERSUS SEQUENTIAL ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATES AND STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY (SRS) IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER AND BRAIN METASTASES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND The risk of radiation necrosis (RN) among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and brain metastases (BrM) treated with SRS alongside antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) requires further study. METHODS A single-centre retrospective cohort study to assess the incidence of RN among women with MBC treated with SRS for BrM at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre from 2004-2024. ADC delivered ≤4 weeks before or after SRS was labelled as concurrent; ADC delivered outside this window was considered sequential. Baseline clinical/pathological and treatment-related factors were abstracted from patients’ medical records. Clinical and treatment characteristics are described with median and range for continuous variables, or frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate factors associated with the development of RN. RESULTS In a database of 1424 patients with breast cancer BrM, 87 (6.1%) received an ADC (T-DXd or T-DM1); 56 (3.9%) patients who received both SRS and an ADC during their disease course formed our cohort. Median age was 60 years (range: 39–85); 50 patients (89%) had HER2+ and 6 patients (11%) had HR+/HER2-low MBC. 22 patients (39%) received an ADC concurrently with SRS and 34 (61%) received an ADC sequentially. Overall, 16 patients (29%) developed RN with the majority being symptomatic (n=11); the incidence of symptomatic RN (SRN) was significantly higher among patients receiving concurrent versus sequential therapy (36% vs 9%; p=0.029). When assessed as continuous variables in univariate analyses, lower equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (p<0.001), larger BrM (p<0.001), and lower patient weight (p<0.001) were associated with a higher risk of SRN. Lesion-based analyses are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSIONS Caution needs to be taken when administering SRS concurrently with an ADC as about a third of patients develop SRN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".