Tau uptake by human neurons depends on receptor LRP1 and kinase LRRK2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extracellular release and uptake of pathogenic forms of the microtubule-associated protein tau contribute to the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. Defining the cellular mechanisms and pathways for tau entry to human neurons is essential to understanding tauopathy pathogenesis and enabling the rational design of disease-modifying therapeutics. Here, whole-genome, loss-of-function CRISPR screens in human iPSC-derived excitatory neurons, the major neuronal cell type affected in these diseases, provide insights into the different cellular pathways for uptake of extracellular monomeric and fibrillar tau. Monomeric and fibrillar tau are both taken up by human neurons by receptor-mediated endocytosis, but involve different routes of entry at the neuronal surface: the low-density lipoprotein LRP1 is the primary receptor for monomeric tau, but contributes less to fibrillar tau entry. Similarly, endocytosis of monomeric tau is dependent on the familial Parkinson's disease gene LRRK2, but not required for endocytosis of fibrillar tau. These findings implicate LRP1 and LRRK2 in the pathogenesis of tauopathies and Parkinson's disease, and identify LRRK2 as a potential therapeutic target for altering progression of these diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".