MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413107232 · doi:10.1038/s44318-025-00514-0

Tau uptake by human neurons depends on receptor LRP1 and kinase LRRK2

2025· article· en· W4413107232 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lewis Evans, Alessio Strano, Eleanor J. Tuck, Ashley Campbell, James Smith, Christy Hung, Tiana S. Behr, Bernardino Ghetti, Benjamin Falcon, Emre Karakoç, Francesco Iorio, Alastair D. Reith, Andrew Bassett, Rick Livesey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe EMBO Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDementias Platform UKAlzheimer’s Research UKGreat Ormond Street Hospital CharityUniversity of OxfordNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchStem Cell NetworkWellcome TrustNIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research CentreBiogen
KeywordsLRP1EndocytosisBiologyLRRK2Cell biologyTauopathyPathogenesisExtracellularNeuroscienceNeurodegenerationReceptorBiochemistryDiseaseImmunologyGeneLDL receptorMutationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular release and uptake of pathogenic forms of the microtubule-associated protein tau contribute to the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. Defining the cellular mechanisms and pathways for tau entry to human neurons is essential to understanding tauopathy pathogenesis and enabling the rational design of disease-modifying therapeutics. Here, whole-genome, loss-of-function CRISPR screens in human iPSC-derived excitatory neurons, the major neuronal cell type affected in these diseases, provide insights into the different cellular pathways for uptake of extracellular monomeric and fibrillar tau. Monomeric and fibrillar tau are both taken up by human neurons by receptor-mediated endocytosis, but involve different routes of entry at the neuronal surface: the low-density lipoprotein LRP1 is the primary receptor for monomeric tau, but contributes less to fibrillar tau entry. Similarly, endocytosis of monomeric tau is dependent on the familial Parkinson's disease gene LRRK2, but not required for endocytosis of fibrillar tau. These findings implicate LRP1 and LRRK2 in the pathogenesis of tauopathies and Parkinson's disease, and identify LRRK2 as a potential therapeutic target for altering progression of these diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe EMBO JournalSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207