SST-DUNet: Smart Swin Transformer and Dense UNet for automated preclinical fMRI skull stripping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skull stripping is a common preprocessing step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) pipelines and is often performed manually. Automating this process is challenging for preclinical data due to variations in brain geometry, resolution, and tissue contrast. Existing methods for MRI skull stripping often struggle with the low resolution and varying slice sizes found in preclinical functional MRI (fMRI) data. NEW METHOD: This study proposes a novel method that integrates a Dense UNet-based architecture with a feature extractor based on the Smart Swin Transformer (SST), called SST-DUNet. The Smart Shifted Window Multi-Head Self-Attention (SSW-MSA) module in SST replaces the mask-based module in the Swin Transformer (ST), enabling the learning of distinct channel-wise features while focusing on relevant dependencies within brain structures. This modification allows the model to better handle the complexities of fMRI skull stripping, such as low resolution and variable slice sizes. To address class imbalance in preclinical data, a combined loss function using Focal and Dice loss is applied. RESULTS: The model was trained on rat fMRI images and evaluated across three in-house datasets, achieving Dice similarity scores of 98.65%, 97.86%, and 98.04%. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: We compared our method with conventional and deep learning-based approaches, demonstrating its superiority over state-of-the-art methods. CONCLUSIONS: The fMRI results using SST-DUNet closely align with those from manual skull stripping for both seed-based and independent component analyses, indicating that SST-DUNet can effectively substitute manual brain extraction in rat fMRI analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.056 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".