MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413111525 · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00297

Fast and Memory-Efficient Searching of Large-Scale Mass Spectrometry Data Using Tide

2025· article· en· W4413111525 on OpenAlexaff
Attila Kertész‐Farkas, Frank Lawrence Nii Adoquaye Acquaye, В. А. Остапенко, Rufino Haroldo Locon, Yang Young Lu, Charles E. Grant, William Stafford Noble

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Research University Higher School of Economics
KeywordsMass spectrometryScale (ratio)Computer scienceChemistryChromatographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past 30 years, software for searching tandem mass spectrometry data against a protein database has improved dramatically in speed and statistical power. However, existing tools can still struggle to analyze truly massive data sets when either the number of spectra or the number of proteins being analyzed grows too large. Here, we describe enhancements to the Tide search engine that allow it to handle data sets containing >10 million spectra and databases containing >7 billion peptides on commodity hardware. We demonstrate that the new Tide architecture is around 2-7 times faster than the previous version and is now comparable to MSFragger and Sage in speed while requiring much less memory. Tide is open source and is publicly available as precompiled binaries for Windows, Linux, and Mac.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207