MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413111525 · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00297

Fast and Memory-Efficient Searching of Large-Scale Mass Spectrometry Data Using Tide

2025· article· en· W4413111525 on OpenAlexaff
Attila Kertész‐Farkas, Frank Lawrence Nii Adoquaye Acquaye, В. А. Остапенко, Rufino Haroldo Locon, Yang Young Lu, Charles E. Grant, William Stafford Noble

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Research University Higher School of Economics
KeywordsMass spectrometryScale (ratio)Computer scienceChemistryChromatographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past 30 years, software for searching tandem mass spectrometry data against a protein database has improved dramatically in speed and statistical power. However, existing tools can still struggle to analyze truly massive data sets when either the number of spectra or the number of proteins being analyzed grows too large. Here, we describe enhancements to the Tide search engine that allow it to handle data sets containing >10 million spectra and databases containing >7 billion peptides on commodity hardware. We demonstrate that the new Tide architecture is around 2-7 times faster than the previous version and is now comparable to MSFragger and Sage in speed while requiring much less memory. Tide is open source and is publicly available as precompiled binaries for Windows, Linux, and Mac.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207