MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413111771 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2025.3591897

T3-ANFIS: Type-3 Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System With a Noniterative Learning Algorithm

2025· article· en· W4413111771 on OpenAlexaff
Ardashir Mohammadzadeh, Khalid A. Alattas, Wenfang Xie, Hamid Taghavifar, Chunwei Zhang, R. Sakthivel

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemArtificial intelligenceKalman filterAlgorithmFuzzy logicMathematicsGaussianFuzzy control systemComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, type-3 (T3) fuzzy logic systems (FLSs) have been widely used in various problems, such as modeling, control systems, image processing, forecasting problems, optimization algorithms, and many others. Most studies of T3-FLS focus on its different applications. However, the basic theory, the applications in real-time and online problems, learning schemes, and the robustness against non-Gaussian noises have been rarely studied. In this article, the simplification of T3-FLSs is taken into account, and the new membership functions (MFs), learning schemes, and type reduction are introduced. The concept of singleton MFs in adaptive fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) is extended to T3-FLSs, and T3-ANFIS is proposed. The type reduction is simplified, and a noniterative learning scheme is developed. The corresponding computations for adaptation laws are derived, and all rules parameters and MF parameters are adjusted. To enhance the robustness versus impulsive noises, a T3-FLS-based correntropy Kalman filter (CKF) is designed. In the suggested algorithm, the kernel-size is not a constant value, but it is online updated by a T3-FLS. Also, to further improve robustness against noisy data, nonsingleton fuzzification for the suggested MF is formulated. By several simulations using real data sets, the feasibility of the suggested T3-FLS is shown, and its superiority is verified by comparisons. Also, the better robustness of suggested T3-FLS-based CKF versus impulsive noises is shown by comparison with traditional KFs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CyberneticsSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207