Pediatric autoimmune gastritis: An international, multicentric study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune gastritis (AIG) has been poorly described in childhood. We sought to identify the patterns of manifestations of pediatric AIG at onset and to describe its laboratory, clinical, and histopathological features. METHODS: This was a retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter, cohort study enrolling histologically proven AIG patients with an onset in the pediatric age (<18 years old). We retrieved laboratory and clinical data at the time of onset and at last follow-up when available. Differences between Helicobacter pylori-exposed versus H. pylori-naïve, and anti-parietal cell antibody (PCA)-positive versus PCA-negative patients were investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 51 pediatric AIG patients (median age: 13 years, interquartile range: 11-16; F:M ratio 1.7:1) were included. Most patients were diagnosed with the overt type of AIG (47; 92.1%), while four (7.8%) were still in the potential phase. Atopic dermatitis (9.8%), rhinitis (7.8%), and asthma (5.9%) were common comorbidities, suggesting a link with T helper 2 (Th2) disorders. Two patients (3.9%) were found to have had previous or concurrent eosinophilic esophagitis, and five (9.8%) had eosinophilic gastritis. Notably, four patients (7.8%) presented with collagenous gastritis. On histological examination, the majority of patients were negative for H. pylori infection, except for 1 case out of 51 (2.0%) who had an active infection. CONCLUSIONS: AIG may affect pediatric patients and lead to complications in this population. At presentation, the disease may exhibit histologic patterns attributed to collagenous and/or eosinophilic gastritis. Moreover, a possible association between AIG and Th2 disorders has been observed, warranting further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".