Using Machine Learning to Improve the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Indeterminate Liver Nodules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Liver cancer ranks among the most lethal cancers. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer and better diagnostic tools are needed to diagnose patients at risk. The aim is to develop a machine learning algorithm that enhances the sensitivity and specificity of the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS-LIRADS) in classifying indeterminate at-risk liver nodules (LR-M, LR-3, LR-4) as HCC or non-HCC. METHODS: Our study includes patients at risk for HCC with untreated indeterminate focal liver observations detected on US or contrast-enhanced CT or MRI performed as part of their clinical standard of care from January 2018 to November 2022. Recursive partitioning was used to improve HCC diagnosis in indeterminate at-risk nodules. Demographics, blood biomarkers, and CEUS imaging features were evaluated as potential predictors for the algorithm to classify nodules as HCC or non-HCC. RESULTS: We evaluated 244 indeterminate liver nodules from 224 patients (mean age 62.9 y). Of the nodules, 73.2% (164/224) were from males. The algorithm was trained on a random 2/3 partition of 163 liver nodules and correctly reclassified more than half of the HCC liver nodules previously categorized as indeterminate in the independent 1/3 test partition of 81 liver nodules, achieving a sensitivity of 56.3% (95% CI: 42.0%, 70.2%) and specificity of 93.9% (95% CI: 84.4%, 100.0%). CONCLUSION: Machine learning was applied to the multicenter, multinational study of CEUS LI-RADS indeterminate at-risk liver nodules and correctly diagnosed HCC in more than half of the HCC nodules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".