MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413115143 · doi:10.2138/gselements.21.4.264

Reel-to-Reel Re-Os Records: Earth System Transactions Preserved in Sediments

2025· article· en· W4413115143 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Kendall, Robert A. Creaser, Judith L. Hannah, Vineet Goswami, Gyana Ranjan Tripathy

Bibliographic record

VenueElements · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReelGeologyArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A unique feature of the Re-Os isotope system is its ability to provide precise and accurate depositional ages from organic-rich sedimentary rocks. Applications include geologic timescale calibration, stratigraphic correlation, and dating key events such as biological innovations, mass extinctions, carbon cycle perturbations, Snowball Earth glaciations, and atmospheric oxygenation. Multiple sediment types reveal temporal variations in the osmium isotope composition of seawater, driven by changes in osmium inputs from continental weathering, seafloor hydrothermal systems, and extraterrestrial material. These variations provide valuable information on climate–tectonic interactions, glacial–interglacial cycles, large igneous province magmatism, bolide impacts, and crustal evolution. Continental processes can be inferred from lake sediment records. These diverse applications highlight the central role of the Re-Os isotope pair in understanding Earth’s evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElementsSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207