Global Emergence of Antifungal‐Resistant Dermatophytosis Caused by <i>Trichophyton indotineae</i> (Formerly <i>T. mentagrophytes</i><scp>ITS</scp> Genotype <scp>VIII</scp>): A Genomic Investigation Involving 14 Countries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trichophyton indotineae is a globally emerging, frequently antifungal-resistant fungus causing severe dermatophytosis. To inform prevention efforts, we analysed the genomic epidemiology and resistance to terbinafine (first-line oral antifungal) from a collection of multinational T. indotineae isolates collected from patients with clinically suspected dermatophytosis during 2016-2023. METHODS: We performed whole genome sequencing and phylogenetic tree analysis based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). T. indotineae phylogenetic results were correlated with patient demographic characteristics and isolate terbinafine susceptibility profiles that were determined by antifungal susceptibility testing and squalene epoxidase gene sequencing. Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton interdigitale isolates from the USA, and Trichophyton rubrum isolates from three countries were added for contextual analysis. RESULTS: Among 347 T. indotineae isolates, 227 (65%) were in vitro resistant to terbinafine. Countries represented were India (43%); Germany (21%); Bangladesh (8%); United States (8%); United Arab Emirates (7%); Iraq (5%); Finland (3%); Poland (2%); Austria, Canada, Cambodia, Estonia, Singapore, and Switzerland (each < 1%). Median SNP difference between isolates was 106 SNPs (range: 0-392). Clustering by age, sex, or country was not observed. One subcluster was composed of terbinafine-resistant isolates with a specific squalene epoxidase gene mutation (F397L) and was widely dispersed among 10 countries. Intra-species genomic diversity was greater among 19 T. rubrum isolates (260 SNPs [range: 73-1038]), or among 10 T. mentagrophytes/T. interdigitale isolates from the USA compared with the intra-species diversity of the T. indotineae isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings corroborate T. indotineae's recent emergence and ongoing international transmission and suggest the rapid spread of a subset of terbinafine-resistant isolates. Continued efforts are necessary to mitigate this pathogen's spread.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".