MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413116637 · doi:10.34067/kid.0000000887

Clinical Implementation of Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin Testing for Diagnosing Acute Kidney Injury in an Academic Tertiary Care Medical Centre

2025· article· en· W4413116637 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Brad Strader, S. Imran, Tariq Abdullah, Candice Fraser, Ellen Saghie, Vladimir Petkov Stoyanov, Jean Côté, Patrick J. Twomey, Patrick Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney360 · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Kidney Injury Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTertiary careAcute kidney injuryUrinary systemMedicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicineEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is a sensitive urinary biomarker in the differentiation of intrinsic (intrarenal) AKI from nonintrinsic (prerenal and postrenal) AKI. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in addition to fractional excretion of urinary sodium and serum creatinine improves accuracy in differentiating intrinsic from nonintrinsic AKI. Background Differentiating functional AKI from structural/intrinsic AKI with tubular injury remains a clinical challenge. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) has shown promise in distinguishing these conditions. This study evaluated the implementation of uNGAL in a heterogeneous medical cohort at an academic tertiary care center in Ireland over a 3-year period. Methods A retrospective audit was conducted from 2020 to 2023. Standard clinical data around the time of AKI and uNGAL request were recorded. Blinded case adjudication of the differential diagnosis of AKI cause using the standard clinical information (but not urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin results) was performed by two expert nephrologists. Analysis of uNGAL focused on the accuracy in differentiating adjudicated (intrarenal) AKI from nonintrinsic AKI (prerenal and postrenal). Results A total of 323 uNGAL tests were performed, with 292 AKI cases adjudicated. Intrinsic AKI cases had significantly higher uNGAL and uNGAL/creatinine ratio (uNGAL/Cr) levels than nonintrinsic cases ( P < 0.001), including after excluding urinary tract infection cases. uNGAL (area under the receiver operation curve [AUC], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.77) and uNGAL/Cr (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.79) showed moderate discriminative performance. uNGAL (threshold [Thr] 150 ng/ml) had high sensitivity (0.87) and negative predictive value (0.82). uNGAL/Cr was similar at the 288 ng/mg Thr. Discriminative performance improved for uNGAL and uNGAL/Cr, but not for serum creatinine, fractional excretion of urinary sodium, or serum urea, after excluding urinary tract infection cases. Both uNGAL (adjusted odds ratios, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.59 to 2.71) and uNGAL/Cr (adjusted odds ratios, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.64 to 2.68) were independently associated with intrinsic AKI. Adding these biomarkers to a logistic regression model significantly improved discrimination performance (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.84; P = 0.0116). Conclusions The use of uNGAL improved the discriminative accuracy of differential diagnosis of AKI in clinical practice by differentiating intrinsic AKI from nonintrinsic. Specificity was low at the manufacturer's recommended Thr (150 ng/ml), but the sensitivity and negative predictive value were high in all analyses. These findings support the clinical utility of uNGAL at the 150 ng/ml Thr as a “rule-out” test for intrinsic AKI, thereby helping to direct management toward functional (prerenal) or obstructive (postrenal) causes when uNGAL is negative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney360Same topicAcute Kidney Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207