MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413116968 · doi:10.1002/marc.202500521

Low‐Hysteresis Cellulose‐Based Hydrogels for Strain Detecting

2025· article· en· W4413116968 on OpenAlexafffund
Xia Sun, Fanghan Luo, Feng Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSelf-healing hydrogelsCelluloseMaterials scienceHysteresisStrain (injury)Polymer scienceComposite materialPolymer chemistryChemical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogels are promising materials for wearable and flexible electronics, yet combining low mechanical hysteresis with high renewable content remains a key challenge. Here, we report a cellulose-based hydrogel with low hysteresis, enabled by incorporating dialcohol nanocellulose (DANC) into a polyacrylamide (PAAM) network. The flexible, hydroxyl-rich DANC chains form abundant reversible hydrogen bonds with the PAAM matrix, allowing the hydrogel to achieve an unprecedented cellulose content of ∼15 wt.% while maintaining stretchability and mechanical robustness. The PAAM/DANC hydrogels display low mechanical hysteresis and high durability during 1000 cyclic strains, with stable mechanical and sensing performance. In addition, the hydrogels exhibit reliable strain sensitivity with a gauge factor of 1.1 and consistent signal output under varying strains. Finally, we demonstrate their potential in wearable strain sensing by detecting complex human motions. This work presents a sustainable strategy to design high-performance cellulose-based hydrogels, advancing their application in next-generation wearable electronics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Rapid CommunicationsSame topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207