MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413117792 · doi:10.1186/s13023-025-03927-6

A cost-utility analysis of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Canada

2025· article· en· W4413117792 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alex Pace, Weston Roda, Corrina Poon, Hugh J. McMillan, Maryam Oskoui, Alex MacKenzie, Pranesh Chakraborty, Jeff Round

Bibliographic record

VenueOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University Health CentreInstitute of Health EconomicsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersMuscular Dystrophy Canada
KeywordsSpinal muscular atrophyHuman geneticsMedicineNewborn screeningPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPediatricsGeneticsPathologyBiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder caused by the loss of the SMN1 gene, with an estimated birth prevalence of about 1 in 10,000. Early intervention with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) significantly improves outcomes. This study evaluates the economic implications and health benefits of newborn screening (NBS) for SMA in Canada from the societal perspective. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed, which combined a decision tree for the screening algorithm and a Markov model for long-term health outcomes. The Markov model included health states based on WHO motor milestones. The population cohort of 357,903 live newborns reflects the 2022-2023 births in Canada. Screening is performed on dried blood spot testing which evaluates for biallelic deletions in SMN1. Cost inputs encompassed treatment and health state costs, while utility values reflected quality of life in each health state. RESULTS: NBS for SMA is expected to identify 37.1 (95% CI: 15.0, 70.7) newborns annually in Canada. Our analysis over a lifetime horizon and a discount rate of 1.5% shows NBS and early treatment has an incremental cost of -$146,187,000 (95% CI: -249,773,777 to - 17,890,034) and incremental benefit of 872 (95% CI: -193, 2329) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to no NBS and late treatment. This resulted in a mean ICER value of -$173,572/QALY. CONCLUSION: The decision analytic model indicated that overall NBS is cost-saving and more effective than no NBS and late treatment in the Canadian health system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrphanet Journal of Rare DiseasesSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207