MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Moment Lyapunov exponents and stochastic stability of non-linear systems under white-noise excitation

2025· article· en· W4413119491 on OpenAlexafffund
Jian Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueProbabilistic Engineering Mechanics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWhite noiseLyapunov exponentMoment (physics)MathematicsStability (learning theory)Noise (video)Statistical physicsLyapunov functionControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisPhysicsNonlinear systemClassical mechanicsStatisticsComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The moment Lyapunov exponent (MLE) is a critical index for assessing the stochastic stability of structures and has been widely applied to linear systems. However, its application to strongly nonlinear systems remains limited due to the inadequacy of traditional methods, such as the method of stochastic averaging. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing the stochastic stability of strongly nonlinear structural systems subjected to parametric excitations modeled as white noise, using MLEs. The analysis begins with the formulation of a strongly nonlinear system. A stochastic averaging method based on a transformed energy envelope is developed to derive a system of Itô stochastic differential equations. Unlike conventional approaches that rely on the Euclidean norm of the state vector, a modified Khasminskii-type transformation is employed, using the square root of the system's Hamiltonian to study stability. To validate the analytical findings, Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to independently compute the MLE. Additionally, the largest Lyapunov exponents and a stability index are evaluated to further characterize the system's stochastic behavior. The effects of key parameters on stability are systematically investigated. This study offers novel insights into the stochastic dynamics of strongly nonlinear structural systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProbabilistic Engineering MechanicsSame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207