MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413120191 · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2025.101203

Beyond cardiac embolism and cryptogenic stroke: unveiling the mechanisms of cerebrovascular events in Chagas disease

2025· review· en· W4413120191 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Eduardo Echeverría, Angie Yarlady Serrano‐García, Lyda Z. Rojas, Federico A. Silva-Sieger, Mónica Navarro, Luisa Fernanda Aguilera Mora, Sergio Alejandro Gómez‐Ochoa, Carlos A. Morillo

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrypanosoma species research and implications
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersPfizer FoundationPfizer
KeywordsChagas diseaseMedicineCardiologyStroke (engine)Cerebral embolismInternal medicineEmbolismPulmonary embolismDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

, remains a significant public health challenge with evolving epidemiological patterns due to migration and globalization. While its cardiac complications are well-characterized, stroke represents an underrecognized yet devastating manifestation, occurring in 3%-20% of patients. Traditionally viewed primarily as a cardioembolic pathophysiology, emerging evidence suggests a more complex pathophysiologic mechanism involving inflammatory, prothrombotic, and microvascular processes. This narrative review examines the multifaceted mechanisms underlying stroke in Chagas disease, integrating recent insights into both cardiac and non-cardiac pathways. We analysed current approaches to risk stratification and prevention, including the utility of the IPEC-FIOCRUZ score and limitations in implementing anticoagulation strategies. This review also addresses emerging challenges, such as the aging of affected populations and limited disease recognition in non-endemic regions, while highlighting opportunities for improving care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Regional Health - AmericasSame topicTrypanosoma species research and implicationsFrench-language works237,207