Understanding the Relationship Between Insulation Aging and Gassing Tendency of Some Biodegradable Dielectric Fluids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the degradation mechanisms and gas generation behaviors of three biodegradable dielectric fluids, bio-based mineral oils (Bio-MO), natural esters (NE), and synthetic esters (SE), under electrical stress, focusing on their application in power transformers. The research adopts an extended experimental protocol that includes multiple aging durations (250–2000 hours) and repeated breakdown voltage (BDV) tests to simulate arc fault conditions and ensure reproducible trend analysis. Key characterizations such as Dissipation Factor (DDF), Interfacial Tension (IFT), and Total Acid Number (TAN) were combined with Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) to monitor fluid degradation. A novel contribution of this work is the statistical correlation framework introduced to quantify the relationships between increases in gases (%C<sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>H<sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub>, %TDCG) and aging markers using correlation coefficients (r, p-value). Furthermore, Duval’s diagnostic tools (Triangle 1/Pentagon 1 for Bio-MO, Triangle 3/Pentagon 3 for esters) revealed that fault types evolve with aging. Specifically, Bio-MO transitioned from high-energy (D2) to low-energy (D1) discharges, strongly correlated with rising %DDF and %TAN. In contrast, NE and SE maintained stable D1 diagnostics. These findings offer a predictive approach to fault identification and transformer health assessment, paving the way for broader implementation with larger sample sets and field validation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".