MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413120429 · doi:10.1109/tdei.2025.3596945

Understanding the Relationship Between Insulation Aging and Gassing Tendency of Some Biodegradable Dielectric Fluids

2025· article· en· W4413120429 on OpenAlexaff
Moïse T. Agouassi, U. Mohan Rao, I. Fofana, Yazid Hadjadj

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Analysis of Composite Materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectricMaterials scienceElectric breakdownDielectric strengthPartial dischargeComposite materialOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the degradation mechanisms and gas generation behaviors of three biodegradable dielectric fluids, bio-based mineral oils (Bio-MO), natural esters (NE), and synthetic esters (SE), under electrical stress, focusing on their application in power transformers. The research adopts an extended experimental protocol that includes multiple aging durations (250–2000 hours) and repeated breakdown voltage (BDV) tests to simulate arc fault conditions and ensure reproducible trend analysis. Key characterizations such as Dissipation Factor (DDF), Interfacial Tension (IFT), and Total Acid Number (TAN) were combined with Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) to monitor fluid degradation. A novel contribution of this work is the statistical correlation framework introduced to quantify the relationships between increases in gases (%C2H2, %TDCG) and aging markers using correlation coefficients (r, p-value). Furthermore, Duval’s diagnostic tools (Triangle 1/Pentagon 1 for Bio-MO, Triangle 3/Pentagon 3 for esters) revealed that fault types evolve with aging. Specifically, Bio-MO transitioned from high-energy (D2) to low-energy (D1) discharges, strongly correlated with rising %DDF and %TAN. In contrast, NE and SE maintained stable D1 diagnostics. These findings offer a predictive approach to fault identification and transformer health assessment, paving the way for broader implementation with larger sample sets and field validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical InsulationSame topicStructural Analysis of Composite MaterialsFrench-language works237,207