Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper develops the concept of a “crip” sociology of fucking to challenge dominant paradigms of sex and sexuality by foregrounding disabled bodies and desires. Building on disability studies and queer theory, I argue that ableist frameworks limit how society conceives intimacy, pleasure, and sexual autonomy. By centering disabled experiences, I highlight alternative timelines, forms of touch, and erotic goals. Introducing “crip time” as a non-linear, responsive approach to sex, the paper explores how disabled communities resist stigma, reclaim agency, and expand what “counts” as sex. Ultimately, a “crip” sociology of fucking proposes a radical rethinking of sexual intimacy that goes beyond normative scripts, whether orgasm-centric or penetration-focused. By exposing how “productivity” and “achievement” logics permeate even the intimate sphere, the article calls for a more inclusive and liberatory vision of desire—one that values difference, embodiment, and relational care as integral to erotic life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it