MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Self-Sustaining Regenerative Amplifier Sensor Using Perfect Metamaterial Absorber for Liquid Concentration Prediction

2025· article· en· W4413122487 on OpenAlexaff
Nazli Kazemi, Güneş Karabulut Kurt, Elham Baladi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialMaterials scienceAmplifierOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a self-powered microwave sensing platform for precise methanol concentration detection in water. The system features a high-efficiency perfect metamaterial absorber (PMA) that converts ambient electromagnetic energy into DC via a dual-stage rectifier, powering an active split-ring-resonator (SRR) sensor. The PMA harvester, optimized with lumped inductors and series capacitors, achieves over 98% absorption efficiency, resulting in stable performance across different angles and polarizations. Operating at 2.4 GHz, the sensor effectively detects methanol concentrations ranging from 0% to 100%. Sensor data is analyzed using an LSTM model for liquid concentration prediction, providing robustness in noisy environments with measurement anomalies. This approach achieves a 98% accuracy rate in predicting methanol concentrations. The compact, energy-efficient system is well-suited for remote monitoring in the food, beverage, and chemical industries, advancing self-powered microwave sensing technology for reliable material characterization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials→French-language works237,207→