MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413125506 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2025.3596790

Data Transformation-Driven Fuzzy Clustering Neural Network With Layerwise and End-to-End Training

2025· article· en· W4413125506 on OpenAlexaff
Yuhu You, Zhen Wang, Zunwei Fu, Eun-Hu Kim, Hao Huang, Witold Pedrycz

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceTraining (meteorology)Layer (electronics)End-to-end principleFuzzy logicFuzzy clusteringPattern recognition (psychology)Data mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we propose a novel data transformation-driven fuzzy clustering neural network (DTFCNN) to enhance the dimensionality reduction function and end-to-end refinment learning ability of the entire structure. Unlike conventional fuzzy clustering-based neural networks, which rely on fuzzy c-means clustering in the hidden layer and least squares error-based learning for connection weights, the DTFCNN utilizes backpropagation (BP) learning as a refinement algorithm. This refinement process enables iterative fine-tuning of the model’s parameters, allowing it to adapt more effectively to complex patterns. By using BP, DTFCNN enhances its ability to learn intricate feature interactions and extract relevant features from high-dimensional spaces, thereby significantly improving the model’s flexibility and performance. The proposed DTFCNN consists of four layers. First, a preprocessing layer employs principal component analysis for feature extraction and dimensionality reduction, where eigenvectors are used as connection weights for the preprocessing layer. Second, a hidden layer utilizes fuzzy c-means clustering for generating fuzzy membership degrees, and centers serve as connection weights for hidden layers. The entries of the partition matrix also are regarded as membership degrees. In the output layer, a linear-driven affine transform is used for fitting connection weights, and a SoftMax function is employed to express the outputs as probabilities. Finally, all parameters, such as eigenvectors, centers, and coefficients, from the preprocessing layer to the output layer are refined through BP-based learning. To validate the effectiveness of the DTFCNN, we conducted a collection of comparison experiments: 1) publicly benchmark datasets with statistical analysis, 2) facial recognition datasets for application-specific testing, and 3) three large-scale datasets. The results demonstrate that the DTFCNN outperforms classical classifiers, state-of-the-art fuzzy classifiers, and deep learning baselines in terms of accuracy and generalization capability. The DTFCNN model uses fewer parameters than deep learning baselines, resulting in faster training times without compromising performance. Overall, the DTFCNN achieves higher accuracy while maintaining model adaptability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy SystemsSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207