MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413127651 · doi:10.18280/ts.420442

Modelling a Novel Filtering and Classifier Approach for ECG Signal Processing

2025· article· en· W4413127651 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dinesh Kumar Jayaraman Rajendiran, C. Ganesh Babu, D. Sundararajan, Nivetha Lokiraj

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Signal processingClassifier (UML)Speech recognitionDigital signal processingComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The records acquired from Electrocardiogram (ECG) are extensively used to predict heart disease.Therefore, the ECG signal is considered essential for evaluating medical data.However, it turns out to be a preliminary device that facilitates the observation of patients' health information.The peak values are an essential peak for providing reliable health conditions.Tracing the ECG signals is treated as the least complex technique for automatic prediction.The VLSI advancements show a significant impact on biomedical signal processing.The advancements rely on the circuit's functionality at high speed and it is modelled to consume lesser power and area.Specifically, for ECG signal denoising, digital signals like IIR and FIR filters are adopted in most real-time applications where FIR is widely used compared to IIR filters due to the higher-order performance and stability.Consequently, this research is investigated in a suitable testing environment to measure the model performance to discover the most delicate steps to address the challenges in the ECG signals.The features obtained through wavelet transform are then redefined and used as input for the classification algorithm and compare and evaluate various assessment metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F-measure, against other methodologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207