MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413127799 · doi:10.18280/ts.420437

A Hybrid Clustering Approach: Segmentation and Classification of Brain Tumour Utilizing SVM and CNN Methods

2025· article· en· W4413127799 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahendrakan Kantharimuthu, Malathi Marichamy

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Support vector machineArtificial intelligenceSegmentationComputer scienceCluster analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gliomas are the most prevalent and destructive kind of tumour which cause extremely short life expectancy in the highest grade.The gliomas type of tumour is assessed using medical imaging modalities like Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technique.In clinical aspects, segmentation methods need a longer time.To increase the patients' lifetime, it is necessary to perform segmentation, recognition, and removal of the affected tumour portion from the MRI images.The proposed system utilises a hybrid clustering technique called the KIFCM Technique.The complex structure, blurred boundaries, and external noise in brain tumours make MRI image segmentation essential for improving accuracy and segmentation stability.Therefore, the hybrid clustering method is proposed.The acquired MRI brain images undergo pre-processing using Otsu's thresholding, followed by hybrid clustering.Further, the segmented portions undergo feature extraction using PCA and DWT to minimise complexity and enhance the performance.The efficiency of the suggested method is compared to that of remaining frameworks for segmentation and classification.The proposed approach provides effective and quick segmentation, yielding 90% accuracy in distinguishing normal and abnormal brain MRI tissue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207