MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413127818 · doi:10.18280/ts.420443

U-NeuroSegNet: A Deep Learning NIWatershed Based Data-Driven Panoptic Segmentation Framework for Identifying Specific Conditions in Neurodegenerative Neurological Disorders

2025· article· en· W4413127818 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S.S. Chintapalli, Balasubadra Kandasamy

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanopticonSegmentationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceDeep learningNeurosciencePsychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main goal is to develop a deep panoptic segmentation model specifically for medical image analysis, with an emphasis on recognizing common neurological disorders.The model aims to precisely identify and categorize various regions in brain scans by integrating sophisticated segmentation techniques with an autoencoder-based deep neural network, thereby aiding in the identification and diagnosis of neurodegenerative neurological disorders.This method has the potential to improve patient outcomes in neurological healthcare by increasing the accuracy of medical image interpretation.The proposed methodology is designed to provide precise and efficient automated detection and segmentation of neurological irregularities, including lesions in medical imagery using brain scan images.Valuable support to healthcare practitioners in their diagnostic and therapeutic efforts potentially in a web-based format for neurological disorders.The proposed model is aimed at supporting healthcare diagnosis by providing a reliable and effective system for the automatic recognition and categorization of neurological disorders using brain imaging techniques.By leveraging the specially designed U-NeuroSegNet infused with big data Spark processing, the model achieved exceptional accuracy and efficiency in identifying neurological abnormalities.In the proposed U-NeuroSegNet, the focus is on contributing significantly to advancements in neuro-oncology and personalized patient care ultimately benefiting individuals affected by neurological disorders.The study utilized large datasets of brain scan images.The U-NeuroSegNet model achieved an F1-score of 95.6%, a high accuracy of 98.2%, precision of 97.8%, sensitivity of 93.7%, and a recall rate of 98.0%.These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the U-NeuroSegNet model in accurately detecting neurological disorders, lesions, and tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207