MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413127923 · doi:10.18280/ts.420448

EEGNet: Detection and Diagnosis of EEG Signals for Epilepsy Disease Using Weighted Empirical Mode Decomposition and EEGNet Architecture

2025· article· en· W4413127923 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Radhika Chenniappan, Chandrasekaran Viswanathan

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert–Huang transformElectroencephalographyEpilepsyPattern recognition (psychology)ArchitectureDecompositionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSpeech recognitionNeurosciencePsychologyBiologyComputer visionGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The detection of focal Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal in the human brain is important to detect and diagnose Epilepsy disease.In this work, the EEG signals can be differentiated into Focal Signal (FS) and Non-Focal Signal (NFS) for Epileptic Seizure detection in the human brain.This proposed system has been designed with preprocessing, signal decomposition module, intrinsic features computations and its optimization with classification and severity diagnosis module.The Chebyshev filter is used in preprocessing stage which suppresses the noise components in the acquired EEG signals and the preprocessed signals are decomposed using Weighted Empirical Mode Decomposition (WEMD).The textural intrinsic features have been computed from the decomposed Intrinsic Mode Function (IMF) sub bands and they are classified by the proposed EEGNet classification architecture, which classifies the test EEG signal into either FS or NFS.Then, FS can be diagnosed into three severity level cases as mild, moderate and severe using the EEGNet architecture.This proposed system has been tested with two independent EEG datasets in order to analyze the stability and robustness of the EEG classification process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207