FLAMEFORGE: Combustion Simulation of Wooden Structures 50
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a unified volumetric combustion simulator that supports general wooden structures capturing the multi-phase combustion of charring materials. Complex geometric structures are represented in a voxel grid for the efficient evaluation of volumetric effects. In addition, a signed distance field is introduced to query the surface information required to compute the insulating effect caused by the char layer. Non-charring materials such as acrylic glass or non-combustible materials such as stone can also be modeled in the simulator. Adaptive data structures are utilized to enable memory-efficient computations within our multiresolution approach. The simulator is qualitatively validated by showcasing the numerical simulation of a variety of scenes covering different kinds of structural configurations and materials. Two-way coupling of our combustion simulator and position-based dynamics is demonstrated capturing characteristic mechanical deformations caused by the combustion process. The volumetric combustion process of wooden structures is further quantitatively assessed by comparing our simulated results to sub-surface measurements of a real-world combustion experiment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it