MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413135349 · doi:10.1061/9780784486368.046

Hydraulic Pickleball: Winning Stillwater’s Resiliency Game by Sending Water Back and Forth

2025· article· en· W4413135349 on OpenAlexaff
Eric W. Cooper, Chris Humes, Louis Iapaolo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Canadian institutionsStillwater (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceSimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The City of Stillwater has a single raw water supply source (Kaw Lake) located nearly 40 mi away with 40-year-old conveyance assets at increasing the risk of failure. To improve the overall raw water system resiliency and redundancy, the City engaged Carollo to evaluate options for adding terminal storage. Carollo recommended using Lake McMurtry, located 7 mi from the WTP, for raw water storage. A new bi-directional raw water transmission main and pump station will allow the City to convey raw water to Lake McMurtry for storage and then pump it back to their WTP. Reservoir operations modeling, water quality blending analysis, and hydraulic evaluations were performed to confirm the viability of this proposed secondary raw water delivery system. This project will provide a raw water supply source in the event of a failure in the Kaw Lake raw water delivery system and allow for proactive maintenance and rehabilitation to substantially improve the City’s overall raw water supply resiliency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesFrench-language works237,207