MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413135741 · doi:10.1061/9780784486375.012

Threading the Needle: Building Dual 42″ Mains in Becks Run Road to Keep Pittsburgh’s Water On

2025· article· en· W4413135741 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Literature and Humor Studies
Canadian institutionsAmerican Water (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDual (grammatical number)Threading (protein sequence)Mains electricityElectrical engineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringPhysicsArtVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Becks Run Raw Water Pumping Station and Intake facility are critical to Pennsylvania American Water Company’s (PAWC) water supply system, delivering 60 million gallons of raw water per day to the Hays Mine Water Treatment Plant. Aging infrastructure, including four transmission mains installed between 1900 and 1953, suffered from leaks, breaks, and reduced capacity due to tuberculation. To ensure a reliable water supply, PAWC initiated the Becks Run Raw Water Main project, replacing outdated mains with 16,000 linear feet of 42-in. ductile iron pipe. A temporary 6,500-ft-long 36-in. HDPE raw water pipeline was constructed to maintain water flow during the upgrade. The project involved overcoming challenges such as unmarked utilities, maintaining traffic on Becks Run Road, addressing thermal expansion in the temporary pipeline, and boring through hillsides for creek crossings. This upgrade is vital for sustaining water supply reliability and operational efficiency in the Becks Run system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAmerican Literature and Humor StudiesFrench-language works237,207