Unveiling the therapeutic potential of octreotide in treating morphine dependence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential of octreotide (OCT), an octapeptide synthetic somatostatin agonist, to mitigate addiction, specifically morphine dependence, was evaluated in a comprehensive approach involving behavioral, molecular, histological, and docking studies. OCT decreased addiction-related behaviors in Wistar rats previously exposed to morphine, normalizing their exploratory activities and reducing drug-seeking behaviors. Histological assessments revealed octreotide-induced reductions in opioid-induced neuronal damage, suggesting a neuroprotective function. Octreotide's behavioral and histopathological effects were associated with regulation of molecular pathways known to be critical in morphine dependence processes, including TLR4, BDNF, SIRT1, and mTOR. Supplementary docking studies elucidated octreotide's high affinity for addiction-related targets, suggesting that a biological interaction between OCT and players in pathways known to play a role in addiction could be involved in behavioral and cellular effects noted. When our results are taken together, we conclude that OCT could be a promising candidate for opioid dependence treatment and underscore the necessity for further preclinical and clinical investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".