MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413139118 · doi:10.1093/brain/awaf279

Connectivity as a universal predictor of tau progression in atypical Alzheimer’s disease

2025· article· en· W4413139118 on OpenAlexafffund
Hannah de Bruin, Colin Groot, Henryk Barthel, Gérard N. Bischof, Ganna Blazhenets, Ronald Boellaard, Baayla D.C. Boon, Matthias Brendel, David M. Cash, William Coath, Gregory S. Day, Bradford C. Dickerson, Elena Doering, Alexander Drzezga, Christopher H. van Dyck, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Carolyn Fredericks, Tim D. Fryer, Elsmarieke van de Giessen, Brian A. Gordon, Jonathan Graff‐Radford, Lea T. Grinberg, Oskar Hansson, Diana A. Hobbs, Merle C. Hoenig, Günter U. Höglinger, David J. Irwin, P. Simon Jones, Keith A. Josephs, Yuta Katsumi, Renaud La Joie, Edward B. Lee, Johannes Levin, Maura Malpetti, Scott M. McGinnis, Adam P. Mecca, Rosaleena Mohanty, Ilya M. Nasrallah, John T. O’Brien, Ryan S. O’Dell, Carla Palleis, Robert Perneczky, Jeffrey S. Phillips, Deepti Putcha, Gil D. Rabinovici, Nesrine Rahmouni, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, James B. Rowe, Michael Rullmann, Osama Sabri, Dorothee Saur, Andreas Schildan, Jonathan M. Schott, Matthias L. Schroeter, William W. Seeley, Stijn Servaes, Irene Sintini, Ruben Smith, Salvatore Spina, Jenna Stevenson, Erik Stomrud, Olof Strandberg, Joseph Therriault, Pontus Tideman, Alexandra Touroutoglou, Anne Trainer, Denise Visser, Fattin Wekselman, Philip S.J. Weston, Jennifer L. Whitwell, David A. Wolk, Keir Yong, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg, Nicolai Franzmeier, Rik Ossenkoppele

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication DisordersNational Institute on AgingNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBayer VitalAvid RadiopharmaceuticalsAlzheimer Society Research ProgramUniversity of California, San FranciscoNational Institutes of HealthDementias Platform UKUK Dementia Research InstituteH. Lundbeck A/SMedical Research CouncilSiemens HealthineersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringSkånes universitetssjukhusAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeStichting DioraphteHORIZON EUROPE European Research CouncilVetenskapsrådetEisaiLunds UniversitetInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleMcGill UniversityAlzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of PittsburghDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftGenentechUniversity of OxfordHjärnfondenFondation Brain CanadaGHR FoundationAlzheimer's AssociationAstex PharmaceuticalsMedical Research Council CanadaAlzheimerfondenWeston Brain InstituteWellcome TrustAlzheimer Forschung InitiativeSanofiGE HealthcareNovo NordiskConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementUniversity of PennsylvaniaKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseCurePSPEli Lilly and CompanyLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchSächsische AufbaubankMassachusetts General HospitalCure Alzheimer's FundBristol-Myers SquibbTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesAlzheimer NederlandBiogenUniversity College London Hospitals Biomedical Research CentreKonung Gustaf V:s och Drottning Victorias FrimurarestiftelseParkinson's FoundationLundbeckfonden
KeywordsNeuroscienceDiseaseAlzheimer's diseaseMedicinePsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The link between regional tau load and clinical manifestation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) highlights the importance of characterizing spatial tau distribution across disease variants. In typical (memory-predominant) AD, the spatial progression of tau pathology mirrors the functional connections from temporal lobe epicentres. However, given the limited spatial heterogeneity of tau in typical AD, atypical (non-amnestic-predominant) AD variants with distinct tau patterns provide a key opportunity to investigate the universality of connectivity as a scaffold for tau progression. In this large-scale, multicentre study across 14 international sites, we included cross-sectional tau-PET data from 320 individuals with atypical AD (n = 139 posterior cortical atrophy/PCA-AD; n = 103 logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia/lvPPA-AD; n = 35 behavioural variant AD/bvAD; n = 43 corticobasal syndrome/CBS-AD), with a subset of individuals (n = 78) having longitudinal tau-PET data. Additionally, as an independent sample, we included regional post-mortem tau stainings from 93 atypical AD patients from two sites (n = 19 PCA-AD, n = 32 lvPPA-AD, n = 23 bvAD, n = 19 CBS-AD). Gaussian mixture modelling was used to harmonize different tau-PET tracers by transforming tau-PET standardized uptake value ratios to tau positivity probabilities (a uniform scale ranging from 0% to 100%). Using linear regression, we assessed whether brain regions with stronger resting-state functional MRI-based functional connectivity, derived from healthy elderly controls in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), showed greater covariance in cross-sectional and longitudinal tau-PET and post-mortem tau pathology. Furthermore, we examined whether functional connectivity of tau-PET epicentres (i.e. the top 5% of regions with the highest baseline tau load) and tau-PET accumulation epicentres (i.e. the top 5% of regions with the highest tau accumulation rates) was associated with cross-sectional and longitudinal tau patterns. Our findings show that tau-PET epicentres aligned with clinical variants, e.g. a visual network predominant pattern in PCA-AD ('visual AD') and left-hemispheric temporal predominance, particularly within the language network, in lvPPA-AD ('language AD'). Moreover, more strongly functionally connected regions showed correlated concurrent tau-PET levels (confirmed with post-mortem data) and tau-PET accumulation rates. The functional connectivity profile of tau-PET epicentres and accumulation epicentres corresponded to tau-PET progression patterns, with higher tau-PET levels and accumulation rates in functionally close regions, and lower tau-PET levels and accumulation rates in functionally distant regions. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that tau propagation occurs along functional connections originating from local epicentres, across all AD clinical variants. Since tau proteinopathy is a major driver of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline, this finding may advance personalized medicine and participant-specific end points in clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207