Cesarean myomectomy for large uterine fibroids: Surgical outcomes from a single‐center case series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of cesarean myomectomy in patients with fibroids greater than 5 cm. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of 45 patients undergoing cesarean delivery with concurrent myomectomy for fibroids >5 cm at a tertiary care center. Primary outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 74 min. On average, 2.5 fibroids were removed, with the largest averaging 10.1 cm in diameter. The mean hemoglobin drop was 2.5 g/dL, significantly associated with fibroid size. Average EBL was 827 mL. No patients required intraoperative transfusion, and only 4.4% required postoperative transfusion. Complication rates were comparable to standard cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Cesarean myomectomy for larger fibroids is feasible and safe within experienced surgical programs, allowing patients to avoid additional surgery without significantly increased risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".