MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413139800 · doi:10.1503/jpn.240150

Childhood trauma and hippocampal-dependent memory across the psychosis spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4413139800 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ava Mason, Mia Harada‐Laszlo, Max Wanduragala, Rui Tang, Paul Jung, Sherin Oommen, Chris R. Brewin, Neil Burgess, James A. Bisby, Michael Bloomfield

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisPsychosisHippocampal formationPsychologyNeuroscienceMedicinePsychiatryClinical psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Although the processes underlying the relationship between developmental trauma and psychosis remain to be elucidated, alterations in hippocampal-dependent memory (HDM) processing may underlie this relationship. We hypothesized that exposure to developmental trauma would be negatively associated with HDM and hippocampal volume and positively associated with intrusive memories among people with psychosis. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of studies published from Dec. 18, 2020, to Nov. 14, 2023, using the search terms “childhood,” “trauma,” “psychosis,” and “memory processing” in Embase, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, OpenGrey, Google Scholar, and PTSDpubs. We conducted meta-analyses of studies that measured developmental trauma (self-report questionnaires or interviews), HDM (episodic memory performance and trauma-memory intrusions), semantic and recognition-memory performance, and hippocampal volume among people with psychosis. Subsample analysis determined whether these associations differed across the psychosis spectrum or for specific abuse types. Results: We included 26 studies. Meta-analyses found that developmental trauma was not associated with total hippocampal volume ( n = 4, outcomes = 6, d = −0.12, standard error [SE] = 0.20, p = 0.2), episodic memory performance ( n = 10, outcomes = 42, d = 0.11, SE = 0.19, p = 0.5), recognition ( n = 3, outcomes = 4, d = −0.55, SE = 0.58, p = 0.3), or semantic memory performance ( n = 4, outcomes = 6, d = 0.08, SE = 0.13, p = 0.6) in participants across the psychosis spectrum. One study found that developmental trauma was associated with impaired episodic memory performance in participants with schizotypal disorder and participants with a mixed phenotype of affective and psychotic symptoms. Two studies found developmental trauma to be associated with increased involuntary memory intrusions in a sample of people with psychosis. Limitations: We did not control for age of trauma, sex, or chronicity of trauma. Results should be considered with caution, given the high publication bias and study heterogeneity seen within meta-analyses. Conclusion: The association between developmental trauma and memory processing may not affect HDM more than the psychotic symptoms already experienced by affected individuals. However, future studies should focus on the effects of developmental trauma on involuntary memory among people with psychosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.027
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience→Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→