MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413141611 · doi:10.1090/tran/9378

Spectral 2-actions, foams, and frames in the spectrification of Khovanov arc algebras

2025· article· en· W4413141611 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anne Dranowski, Guo Meng, Aaron D. Lauda, A. Manion

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArmy Research OfficeSimons FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leveraging skew Howe duality, we show that Lawson–Lipshitz–Sarkar’s spectrification of Khovanov’s arc algebra gives rise to 2-representations of categorified quantum groups over <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="double-struck upper F 2"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">F</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathbb {F}_2</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> that we call spectral 2-representations. These spectral 2-representations take values in the homotopy category of spectral bimodules over spectral categories. We view this as a step toward a higher representation theoretic interpretation of spectral enhancements in link homology. A technical innovation in our work is a streamlined approach to spectrifying arc algebras, using a set of canonical cobordisms that we call frames, that may be of independent interest. As a step toward extending these spectral 2-representations to integer coefficients, we also work in the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="German g German l Subscript 2"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">g</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="fraktur">l</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathfrak {gl}_2</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> setting and lift the Blanchet–Khovanov algebra to a multifunctor into a multicategory version of Sarkar–Scaduto–Stoffregen’s signed Burnside category.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207