A study of the efficacy of generative flow networks for robotics and machine fault-adaptation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advancements in robotics have opened possibilities to automate tasks in various fields such as manufacturing, emergency response and healthcare. However, a significant challenge that prevents robots from operating in real-world environments effectively is out-of-distribution (OOD) situations, wherein robots encounter unforseen situations. One major OOD situations is when robots encounter faults, making fault adaptation essential for real-world operation for robots. Current state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithms show promising results but suffer from sample inefficiency, leading to low adaptation speed due to their limited ability to generalize to OOD situations. Our research is a step towards adding hardware fault tolerance and fast fault adaptability to machines. In this research, our primary focus is to investigate the efficacy of generative flow networks in robotic environments, particularly in the domain of machine fault adaptation. We simulated a robotic environment called Reacher in our experiments. We modify this environment to introduce four distinct fault environments that replicate real-world machines/robot malfunctions. The empirical evaluation of this research indicates that continuous generative flow networks (CFlowNets) indeed have the capability to add adaptive behaviors in machines under adversarial conditions. Furthermore, the comparative analysis of CFlowNets with reinforcement learning algorithms also provides some key insights into the performance in terms of adaptation speed and sample efficiency. Additionally, a separate study investigates the implications of transferring knowledge from pre-fault task to post-fault environments. Our experiments confirm that CFlowNets has the potential to be deployed in a real-world machine and it can demonstrate adaptability in case of malfunctions to maintain functionality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".