MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413143208 · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2025.114561

A bioinspired method for fatigue crack path tailoring and life enhancement in metals via additive manufacturing

2025· article· en· W4413143208 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Shojaati, Ghazal Mahdaviyan, Joshua Bell, Hamid Jahed, Ehsan Toyserkani, Saeed Maleksaeedi

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials & Design · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialPath (computing)Structural engineeringEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by natural systems, weak features can be strategically incorporated into materials to enhance mechanical response. This study presents, for the first time, a bioinspired approach enabled by additive manufacturing to tailor crack paths and enhance fatigue life in metallic components. Cylindrical holes of varying diameters and patterns were embedded as site-specific weak features in 18Ni(300) maraging steel produced via laser powder bed fusion. Fatigue crack growth tests in solution-annealed and aged conditions revealed that a region of weak features can effectively tailor crack path in solution-annealed condition while improving fatigue life in both conditions. In solution-annealed condition, crack deviation, bifurcation and transition of fatigue crack growth stage improved the fatigue life by 26%. In the aged condition, however, the lower fracture toughness limited the crack path tailoring, and retardation due to the crack re-initiation enhanced fatigue life by 14%. In both conditions, rough surfaces of holes restricted the maximum fatigue life improvement. This study demonstrates the unique potential of AM to integrate weak features into metallic materials for crack engineering. By refining the holes roughness in further steps, crack engineering via AM can be realized, offering a pathway to further optimize components’ durability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials & DesignSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207