MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413144756 · doi:10.1109/cvpr52734.2025.02553

CorrBEV: Multi-View 3D Object Detection by Correlation Learning with Multi-modal Prototypes

2025· article· en· W4413144756 on OpenAlexaff
Ziteng Xue, Mingzhe Guo, Heng Fan, Shihui Zhang, Zhipeng Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsModalComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceObject detectionObject (grammar)CorrelationComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Camera-only multi-view 3D object detection in autonomous driving has witnessed encouraging developments in recent years, largely attributed to the revolution of fundamental architectures in modeling bird’s eye view (BEV). Despite the growing overall average performance, we contend that the exploration of more specific and challenging corner cases hasn’t received adequate attention. In this work, we delve into a specific yet critical issue for safe autonomous driving: occlusion. To alleviate this challenge, we draw inspiration from the human amodal perception system, which is proven to have the capacity for mentally reconstructing the complete semantic concept of occluded objects with prior knowledge. More specifically, we introduce auxiliary visual and language prototypes, akin to human prior knowledge, to enhance the diminished object features caused by occlusion. Inspired by Siamese object tracking, we fuse the information from these prototypes with the baseline model through an efficient depth-wise correlation, thereby enhancing the quality of object-related features and guiding the learning of 3D object queries, especially for partially occluded ones. Furthermore, we propose the random pixel drop to mimic occlusion and the multi-modal contrastive loss to align visual features of different occlusion levels to a unified space during training. Our inspiration originates from addressing occlusion, however, we are surprised to find that the proposed framework also enhances robustness in various challenging scenarios that diminish object representation, such as inclement weather conditions. By applying our model to different baselines, i.e., BEVFormer and SparseBEV, we demonstrate consistent improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207