Insightful Instance Features for 3D Instance Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent 3D Instance Segmentation methods typically encode hundreds of instance-wise candidates with instance-specific information in various ways and refine them into final masks. However, they have yet to fully explore the benefit of these candidates. They overlook the valuable cues encoded in multiple candidates that represent different parts of the same instance, resulting in fragments. Also, they often fail to capture the precise spatial range of 3D instances, primarily due to inherent noises from sparse and unordered point clouds. In this work, to address these challenges, we propose IKNE, a novel instance-wise knowledge enhancement approach. We first introduce an Instance-wise Knowledge Aggregation (IKA) to associate scattered single instance details by optimizing correlations among candidates representing the same instance. Moreover, we present an Instance-wise Structural Guidance (ISG) to enhance the spatial understanding of candidates using structural cues from ambiguity-reduced features. Here, we utilize a simple yet effective truncated singular value decomposition algorithm to minimize inherent noises of 3D features. In our extensive experiments on large-scale datasets, ScanNetV2, ScanNet200, S3DIS, and STPLS3D, IKNE outperforms existing works. We validate the effectiveness of our modules in both kernel-based and transformer-based architectures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".