Beyond Clean Training Data: A Versatile and Model-Agnostic Framework for Out-of-Distribution Detection with Contaminated Training Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In real-world AI applications, training datasets are often contaminated, containing a mix of in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) samples without labels. This contamination poses a significant challenge for developing and training OOD detection models, as nearly all existing methods assume access to a clean training dataset of only ID samples—a condition rarely met in real-world scenarios. Customizing each existing OOD detection method to handle such contamination is impractical, given the vast number of diverse methods designed for clean data. To address this issue, we propose a universal, model-agnostic framework that integrates with nearly all existing OOD detection methods, enabling training on contaminated datasets while achieving high OOD detection accuracy on test datasets. Additionally, our framework provides an accurate estimation of the unknown proportion of OOD samples within the training dataset—an important and distinct challenge in its own right. Our approach introduces a novel dynamic weighting function and transition mechanism within an iterative training structure, enabling both reliable estimation of the OOD sample proportion of the training data and precise OOD detection on test data. Extensive evaluations across diverse datasets, including ImageNet-1k, demonstrate that our framework accurately estimates OOD sample proportions of training data and substantially enhances OOD detection accuracy on test data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".