LatentHOI: On the Generalizable Hand Object Motion Generation with Latent Hand Diffusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current research on generating 3D hand-object interaction motion primarily focuses on in-domain objects. Generalization to unseen objects is essential for practical applications, yet it remains both challenging and largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose LatentHOI, a novel approach designed to tackle the challenges of generalizing hand-object interaction synthesis to unseen objects. Our main insight lies in decoupling high-level temporal motion from fine-grained spatial hand-object interactions via a latent diffusion model coupled with a Grasping Variational Autoencoder (Grasp-VAE). This configuration introduces regularization by enforcing a conditional dependency between spatial grasping and temporal motion, as well as through the regularized latent space for better generalization ability. We conducted extensive experiments in an unseen-object setting on both single-hand grasping and bi-manual motion datasets, including GRAB, DexYCB†, and OakInk. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the realism and physical plausibility of generated motions for unseen objects, both in single and bimanual manipulations, compared to the state-of-the-art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".