PIAD: Pose and Illumination agnostic Anomaly Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We introduce the Pose and Illumination agnostic Anomaly Detection (PIAD) problem, a generalization of pose-agnostic anomaly detection (PAD). Being illumination agnostic is critical, as it relaxes the assumption that training data for an object has to be acquired in the same light configuration of the query images that we want to test. Moreover, even if the object is placed within the same capture environment, being illumination agnostic implies that we can relax the assumption that the relative pose between environment light and query object has to match the one in the training data. We introduce a new dataset to study this problem, containing both synthetic and real-world examples, propose a new baseline for PIAD, and demonstrate how our baseline provides state-of-the-art results in both PAD and PIAD, not only in the new proposed dataset, but also in existing datasets that were designed for the simpler PAD problem. Project page: https://kaichen-yang.github.io/piad/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".