MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413148261 · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2025.100612

Adjoint analysis of PM2.5 and O3 episodes in priority control zones in China

2025· article· en· W4413148261 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science and Ecotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersShenzhen Science and Technology Innovation ProgramSouthern University of Science and TechnologyMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChinaControl (management)Environmental scienceClimatologyGeographyMeteorologyComputer scienceGeologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding and mitigating PM 2.5 and ozone (O 3 ) pollution remains challenging due to the nonlinear atmospheric chemistry and spatially heterogeneous nature of pollutant emissions. Traditional forward modeling approaches suffer from high computational cost and limited diagnostic resolution to precisely attribute emissions sources at fine spatial, temporal, and chemical scales. Adjoint modeling has emerged as an efficient alternative, enabling high-resolution, multi-pollutant source attribution in a single integrated framework; however, its application to simultaneous PM 2.5 –O 3 pollution episodes is limited, particularly in densely populated regions experiencing complex co-pollutant interactions. Here we apply a newly developed multiphase adjoint of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to quantify the emission sensitivities of PM 2.5 and O 3 concentrations during pollution episodes in major urban agglomerations. Our results indicate that local emissions predominantly drive PM 2.5 concentrations, contributing up to 79 μg m −3 . In contrast, O 3 episodes are largely initiated by regional transport (3.8–7.3 ppbv), surpassing local emission contributions during episode onset. The sensitivity analyses reveal distinct spatial emission signatures and pollutant-specific influences from critical precursors, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs; up to 15.9 ppbv O 3 , 11.4 μg m −3 PM 2.5 ), nitrogen oxides (NO x ; 16.6 ppbv O 3 , 13.8 μg m −3 PM 2.5 ), and ammonia (NH 3 ; up to 8.7 μg m −3 PM 2.5 ). This study demonstrates the diagnostic strength and predictive capabilities of adjoint modeling in unraveling complex source–receptor relationships. By offering detailed, pollutant-specific emission sensitivity information, our approach provides a robust foundation for precision-driven emission control strategies and improved cross-regional policy coordination, substantially advancing air quality management frameworks. • Adjoint modeling resolves emission sources across space, time, and species for co-occurring PM 2.5 –O 3 pollution. • PM 2.5 is mainly locally driven (up to 79 μg m −3 ), while O 3 episodes arise mostly from regional transport (5.2–7.3 ppbv). • VOCs, NO x , and NH 3 are key precursors. • NH 3 strongly affects PM 2.5 (up to 8.7 μg m −3 ), highlighting control value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it