Compound Delivery of eVLPs Enhances Prime Editing for Targeted Genome Engineering and High-Throughput Screening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Engineered virus-like particles (eVLPs) enable transgene-free ribonucleoprotein delivery for genome editing applications, yet optimized delivery strategies for high-throughput applications remain unexplored. Prime editing enables precise genomic modifications but suffers from limited efficiency that constrains its widespread adoption. Here, we present PRIME-VLP (Progressive Repeated Infections for Maximized Editing via Virus-Like Particles), a delivery strategy that enhances prime editing efficiency for both targeted genome engineering and high-throughput prime editing screening. PRIME-VLP leverages the temporal dynamics of eVLP-mediated editing through multiple sequential transductions with sub-saturating eVLP doses delivered at optimal intervals. This approach achieves 1.5 to 2.8-fold improvements in editing efficiency across diverse genomic targets and cell types. PRIME-VLP maintains high specificity without increasing off-target effects, compromising cellular viability or causing transcriptional perturbations. By decoupling pegRNA and editor delivery through pegRNA-free eVLPs, PRIME-VLP enables pooled prime editing screens, circumventing transgene silencing limitations of conventional lentiviral-based screens. Using a 6,000-pegRNA library targeting TP53 , PRIME-VLP achieved 2.8-fold higher editing efficiency and improved reproducibility compared to conventional lentiviral delivery. An eVLP-based screen identified functional TP53 loss-of-function variants that confer resistance to MDM2 inhibition by Nutlin-3. This work expands the versatility of eVLPs beyond their current in vivo therapeutic applications, demonstrating their promise for high-throughput functional genomics by overcoming the delivery limitations of lentiviral systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".