MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413148579 · doi:10.64152/10125/25096

Review of Call: Media, Design, & Applications

2000· article· en· W4413148579 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage learning & technology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Communication and Language
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLinguisticsMultimediaWorld Wide WebPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This edited volume contains three sections, Media, Design, and CALL Applications, as well as an introduction and an epilogue.Editor Keith Cameron, one of the best known experts in computer-assisted language learning in the United Kingdom, introduces the volume with a brief history of CALL that provides a context for the rest of the volume, which in turn is intended to "provide a focus for future research, be a stimulus to graduates embarking on Master's or Doctoral programs, encourage reflection amongst established CALLers, increase awareness of what has been done and what still has to be done in the CALL domain, and establish a reference work which is unavoidably incomplete but will constitute a source of essential information for all those involved in CALL" (p. 2).In this introduction, Cameron emphasizes that CALL: Media, Design, & Applications deals with language learning rather than language teaching.Like two other recent collections reviewed in LLT, New Ways of Learning and Teaching: Focus on Technology and Foreign Language Education (Bradley & Lomicka, 2000), and Technology-Enhanced Language Learning (O' Leary, 1998), this volume includes articles by a variety of well-known CALL practitioners and researchers.In contrast with those volumes, however, CALL: Media, Design, & Applications is extremely international; the authors included hail from three continents, with Europe and Canada best represented.Like the other two volumes, this collection is also very diverse in terms of the authors' background, interests, level of discourse, and experience in CALL.This diversity of educational situations and cultures, while it makes for some unevenness, is a breath of fresh air and allows for perspectives not possible in the other volumes.In general, CALL: Media, Design, & Applications meets the goals outlined by the editor.Thus, it represents a significant contribution to the field of CALL and will be an important addition to many researchers' libraries.Especially valuable are the contributors' extensive bibliographies, and their reflections on the future of the topics covered.Yet, it is also important to note that this volume, like any book dealing with technology, is not always completely up-to-date, an observation intended not to disparage this work, but rather to point out one of the most frustrating problems of working in a field which is evolving so quickly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it