MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

måmawi-kiskinohamakosiwin

2025· article· en· W4413149031 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lydia Toorenburgh

Bibliographic record

VenuePawaatamihk A Journal of Métis Thinkers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colonial definitions of scholar and scholarship are narrow, elitist, and hierarchical. The Mawachihitotaak Symposium organizers intentionally invited presenters and attendees from both within and outside of academia as equals and kin. Highlighting this inclusive approach, the author invites Métis people to think expansively about who a scholar is and what constitutes scholarship, reminding us of our cultural values and perspectives on knowledge and learning and leading us from exclusionary colonial definitions toward holism and community appreciation. Discussing several presentations and incorporating nehiyawewin (the Cree language), drawing, and poetics, this article offers lessons from the brilliant Metis thinking at Mawachihitotaak 2024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePawaatamihk A Journal of Métis ThinkersSame topicHong Kong and Taiwan PoliticsFrench-language works237,207