MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Making Family (Famii) and Building our Nation in the diaspora

2025· article· en· W4413149136 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michelle Smith, Mel Lefebvre, Sidney Leggett

Bibliographic record

VenuePawaatamihk A Journal of Métis Thinkers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityConcordia UniversityDawson College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaSociologyHistoryGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coming together as Red River Métis people in what is known as Tio'tia:ke/Mooniyang/ Montreal, Quebec, we find ourselves in a microcosm of the broader settler context of so-called Canada. As part of the “diaspora”, we share common experiences - striving to live as good neighbours and fulfill our responsibilities as guests, living our values and relationality with the people, lands, and waters where we find ourselves. We also have unique and personal journeys that have guided our decisions and feelings living outside the homeland. Here we add to our presentation at Mawachihitotaak 2024 and discussion of diaspora in the East through our map of collective mobilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePawaatamihk A Journal of Métis ThinkersSame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207