Bridging papermaking and zinc-ion batteries: Engineering partial Janus separators from hierarchically porous softwood fibers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zinc-ion batteries are emerging as promising candidates for grid and large-scale energy storage due to their intrinsic safety, low cost, and aqueous chemistry. However, challenges related to zinc anode instability—such as corrosion, side reactions, and dendrite formation—continue to hinder practical deployment. Here, we present a papermaking-based strategy for separator engineering, grounded in the principles and industrial platform of papermaking wet-end chemistry and additive technology. Chemically pulped softwood fibers, with lignin and hemicellulose removed to some extent, exhibit hierarchically porous walls enriched with hydroxyl groups and interfibrillar gaps—providing an ideal substrate for post-treatment using dilute polymer–solvent systems. Using poly (vinylidene fluoride) and N -methyl-2-pyrrolidone as a model system, we demonstrate the formation of a spatially heterogeneous, partially hydrophobic network—a partial Janus structure—within the cellulosic paper. This treatment introduces hydrophobic domains while preserving ion-conductive pathways, achieving a favorable balance between Zn 2+ transport and water activity regulation. The resulting modified paper exhibits enhanced wet mechanical strength, corrosion resistance, interfacial stability, and long-term cycling performance. Full-cell and pouch cell tests further confirm the mechanical robustness and electrochemical reliability of the engineered separator. In addition, a green chitosan-based treatment is also demonstrated, highlighting the potential for sustainable additive systems to achieve similar structural and electrochemical benefits. This work shows how papermaking-derived materials, revisited through the lens of interfacial chemistry, can offer scalable and adaptable solutions to longstanding challenges in aqueous battery separator design. • Papermaking wet-end chemistry & additives applied to engineer battery separators • Multiscale porous structure of softwood fiber walls retained after interfacial engineering • Partial Janus interfacial structure formed via polymer–solvent self-assembly • Partial Janus paper modulates Zn 2+ transport while suppressing water-induced reactions. • Concept generalizable beyond current additives via fiber–additive interactions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".